Welcome to In Context!

Here you will find information on public affairs issues with commentary by Ken MacDermotRoe and Gus Cantavero, co-hosts of In Context, as well as links to In Context radio programs, podcasts and videos. As with their call-in show, Ken and Gus would like to hear your opinion. So please feel free to post comments. Also, be sure to subscribe to this blog so you can be updated on our show schedule with announcements of times, topics and guests!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Gingrich and Romney Share Cringe Moment on Palestinian Peace Question

In the January 26th Jacksonville, Florida debate televised on CNN an audience member of Palestinian descent asked a question about what the candidates would do to promote peace between Palestinians and Israel. Only Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich were given a chance to respond, after all, political debates are not about debating issues, they are about being the biggest demagogue. I do think it’s safe to say that neither Romney nor Gingrich are very concerned with pandering to the republican arab vote.

Both Newt and Mitt agree with each other and yet Rep. Ron Paul wasn’t even consulted to weigh in on the topic even though everyone knows he would have had an opposing view. Shouldn’t it be considered good debate moderation to allow opposing views to be heard and solicited in the spirit of actual debate of controversial issues?

The poor guy who asked the question was treated very callously and must have felt like he was a criminal the way he was treated. Romney almost appeared offended by the question even being asked. Yet he asked a question about a very complex and multi-faceted issue. Unfortunately for everyone though, the answer he was given was quite un-complex and one dimensional. He was essentially told that neither candidate would support peace with Palestine unless the Palestinians make more concessions and stop fighting back. This is easy for chicken-hawks like Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney to say since they’ve never lived in ghettos without access to medicine, jobs, food and freedom of travel. The Israeli’s are after all the ones who are continuing to build settlements in Palestinian territory in blatant disregard to all U.N. rulings and pleas by outside parties attempting to help negotiate peace. Ever seen all the videos of the Israeli army guarding guarding chainsaw operators as they cut down Palestinian olive trees on private property?

The Israelis encroach on private property day after day, pushing the Palestinians into a small corner and act indignant when they are attacked, either with gun or something as simple as rocks. Clearly, there cannot be peace as long as some Palestinian leaders say things like they want the eradication of Israelis and  the Palestinians MUST act and reject this kind of speech because it only does them a disservice by promoting violence and portraying them as aggressors.

Saying that we can’t have peace until the Palestinians stop fighting back is like like blaming someone who is being smothered with a pillow for flailing their arms. “Not until this person stops flailing their arms while we have peace! Of course, he will be dead, but we will have peace nonetheless.” The Palestinians are being occupied, just like the Afghans and Iraqis. What is the constant theme amongst occupations? Insurgency. Until we get this point, we won’t understand foreign policy and won’t be fit to be called the “leaders of the free world”. This is like having a tax cheat as our secretary of the treasury. Oh wait, we already have that.

Posted in Democracy, Elections, Media, Ron Paul, War | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Rick Santorum’s Foreign Policy: A Symphony of Destructionn

Rick Santorum’s foreign policy is the most frightening thing I’ve ever heard. His policy is essentially this: impose crippling sanctions to impoverish people in other countries so that they cause a bloody revolution that our CIA can steer. Then all that’s left is to install a puppet dictator that will do our bidding.

This method has been used ad nauseam over the past 60 years and has done nothing but cause an endless cycle of violence and destruction. It has been used in South American, Asia, Africa and in the Middle East over and over again, and yet we are still having the same conversation. Ron Paul is the only candidate that actually wants to try something else and yet he is counted as someone outside the mainstream whose foreign policy is a weakness. Are we to deduce from that logic that using the same failed policies of the past 60 years is supposed to represent strength? This would be akin to attempting to tear down a brick wall by using one’s forehead because it would prove a great feat of strength. It sure would, but since it’s impossible you might as well just try something more appropriate. Instead of representing strength, it instead represents arrogance and a narrow view of history. Ron Paul should challenge Santorum to show examples of where CIA sponsored regime changes have lead to continued prosperity over decades. Our policies in Iraq and Iran have given us our current quagmire by overthrowing Iran’s democratically elected government in 1953. Kermit Roosevelt led operation Ajax, a CIA coup to reinstate the Shah and re-privatize the oil industry so that American and British oil companies could reap huge profits. American policy instated Saddam Hussein and yet it was seen as a noble mission to free Iraqis from his iron grip. Inversely, the Soviet Union fell not because of a war or a bloody revolution but because of economic reasons. They just couldn’t afford  it anymore. Even China, while still completely authoritarian, has had to allow more freedom in their economy in order to prevent a collapse and has profited greatly from trading with the USA. There are many other problems with that scenario, too many for the scope of this article, but I raise it as an example because there is an inlet made in China where the citizens have been exposed to outside communication and know how exploited they are. It is really only a matter of time before they take a significant portion of the power back into the hands of the people.

Rick Santorum’s constant belaboring of his fear of Islamic extremists is almost comically reminiscent of the crusades. Or, it would be comical if it weren’t so frightening. His irrational fear of islam is something he’s going to have to come to terms with eventually, given that muslims make up roughly 20% of the entire world’s population. I think Santorum would be just as happy to blow off the entire eastern hemisphere and send it hurtling towards the sun. I’m sure in his mind, losing the tip of Alaska is a small price to pay. Israel, of course, can have Newt Gingrich’s moon colony and be our 51st state.

I am not a muslim, but I am with Ron Paul in my support for all people’s right to religion and self expression. There is no reason that the United States cannot stand as a nation where all people worship as they wish as long as they respect our laws, constitution and bill of rights. A non-interventionist foreign policy, something we haven’t practiced in many, many years would be not only a boon for our economy but it would be a boon for our liberties and foreign relations. People in other countries would be heartened to emulate us by adopting our constitution because of the example we would set. They would see that it’s possible for people to live side by side and worship in the way they wish without having to be ruled by an oppressive dictator who restricts individual liberties. Rick Santorum and people like him, are so blinded by their personal beliefs that they cannot even see the lessons that history has taught us. That peace cannot be and result of force. That someone has to first offer an apology and a hand of friendship before it can be accepted. He has to be willing to see that the attacks of 9/11, as dubious and full of unanswered questions as they are, were not an unprovoked frontal assault on our freedoms like that of a comic book villain hell bent on causing mischief for its own sake.

We must first start with a clean slate that treats everyone fairly and Ron Paul has a pretty good plan. No foreign aid for anyone, no undermining elections, no US sponsored regime changes, free trade with everyone, in short: no favoritism. Favoring one over another, either militarily or economically is essentially a subversive act of war. Rick Santorum thinks that this is our divine right as Americans to shape the world as we see fit and anyone who disagrees is either naive or a coward. But to undermine another country’s sovereignty because our corporations demand higher profits and not expect blowback is the most naive position possible. It’s hard to really put a finger on what Santorum believes since he only ever gets skin deep with his well rehearsed rhetoric, but it sounds like he believes he has the right to poke someone in the eye and then be insulted that they have the insolence to be angry about it.

Posted in Assassinations, CIA, Democracy, Elections, Media, Ron Paul, War | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Podcast for guest appearance on The Emotion Roadmap

We were guests on the Chuck Wolffe’s program on WPKN The Emotion Roadmap. We discussed the emotional angle of elections and what people respond to in candidates. We talked primarily about Newt Gingrich and how he uses arrogance and an appeal to authority to convince voters of his wisdom. We talked about Mitt Romney and his utter lack of emotional appeal and we talked about Barrack Obama “empty vessel technique” which allows for supporters to pour their own hopes and dreams into him, thus projecting their ideal candidate. We spoke a little about Ron Paul, although the host didn’t want to. I expect that from the mainstream, but not community radio. Go figure. To hear the podcast of the conversation you can use this link.

Posted in Democracy, Elections, Propaganda, Ron Paul | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Podcast for January 23, 2012

If you missed the show today you can download the podcast. We began the show with a roundup of the news. Then we spoke to Ebong Udoma, a Connecticut journalist who has been following the state government’s reports on Connecticut Light and Power’s failures to respond to weather emergencies.

Posted in Show news, War | Tagged | Leave a comment

Ignoring Ron Paul: Establishment Goes Into Propaganda Overdrive

Ron Paul during Myrtle Beach debate

MYRTLE BEACH, SC - JANUARY 16: Republican presidential candidates, former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich and U.S. Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) (Photo by Charles Dharapa-Pool/Getty Images)

There is no way around it, the republican AND democrat establishment not only deliberately ignores, but clearly fears Ron Paul and his peace agenda. Much of today’s main sleaze media is actually op-ed masquerading as unbiased hard news reporting. When a story is read on one of the primary networks it is always followed with a panel of so called experts. They inevitably do their best to sway public opinion by pre-digesting and interpreting the stories for the viewer. Even if the viewer is someone who can think for their self, the one-way transmission is essentially a download into the viewer. In the early part of the primary cycle the buzz about Ron Paul was that he was ignored, then as his movement grew and participants kept dropping out of the running, the blatant lack of coverage turned into mocking and misrepresentation. The most shocking part of this coverage is that it is consistent across networks regardless of angle. The interesting thing about Ron Paul is that he is equally appealing across political spectrums. This is why Ron Paul polls the best among democrats, independents and minority groups. One would think that this would make him the most electable among the republican candidates in a general election, yet the most repeated phrase by the pundits on all networks is that he is “un-electable”.

The modern American is trained from grade school to not think, but instead to accept and regurgitate. In high school social studies or English, if a topic is discussed, the essay written in response had better be in agreement or the student will have a hill to climb to maintain a passing grade. Dissent is simply not tolerated in modern American society. American’s go from school, to college where they take classes they aren’t interested in, memorizing, repeating, and discarding information in 15-week cycles, unless of course you have a cumulative final, perish the thought. We then graduate and some of us move into the corporate hierarchy where we are expected to agree with our superiors in order to be branded as a team player. Those who question their bosses are willingly putting their necks on the chopping blocks or are risking being passed over for promotion lest we make our bosses look bad. This strategy is what produces the rampant ineptitude at the highest levels of our industries and government.

As adults, we are treated like grade school students with flashy graphics and rapidly changing segments full of opinion and spin, interrupted every few minutes by drug and car ads. Hearing a constant stream of intellectually dishonest spin will confuse anyone, even the smartest among us. It’s scientifically proven that the flicker rates of television and rapid graphics subdue the alpha waves of the human mind, essentially putting us into a catatonic daydream state, perfectly fit for brainwashing.  Have you ever turned to someone you were watching TV with and said, “Wow, did you hear what he just said?” and they reply “Oh I wasn’t listening” even though they were looking right at the TV. I know I’ve personally experienced that many times. It’s also shown that the more TV you watch, the quicker one enters this trance state. Your mind is literally battling for control of your consciousness, but it cannot keep up with the barrage of information coming at it. Eventually your mind will succumb and begin to relax, at which point it just downloads and accepts. At this point your mind is being programmed so it can regurgitate the memorized information at a later time. When a brainwashed democrat meets a brainwashed republican they repeat the mantras they downloaded from their favorite networks to each other, getting nowhere. They come away from the meeting convinced that the other is an idiot.

When talking to people about Ron Paul, particularly republicans, the first response I get is that “he has great ideas, I really like him, but it’s too bad he’s not electable”. When I talk to independents or democrats I typically hear that they really like him and hope he runs as an independent. If republicans were serious about winning elections they would seek to expand their party, but instead they seem pre-occupied with simply maintaining a stranglehold on the minds of their base. The options in this year’s elections with the exception of Ron Paul, offer no discernible difference in terms of their stance on personal liberties, war, the economy, the drug war and foreign relations. Yet, the coverage is obsessed with the personalities and past inconsistencies of the candidates. The media does its utmost to avoid talking about the actual policies of the candidates. The only time pundits mention policy, is to go out their way to say that Ron Paul’s policy is dangerous or that he’s an isolationist. In reality, Paul has really attractive stances for democrats in that he wants to de-criminalize victimless drug possession, end capital punishment, end the wars and promote peace abroad. He also has many platforms that should appeal to republicans such as securing our border with Mexico (which is now officially more dangerous than Afghanistan), ending the Federal Reserve and re-establish the treasury to create debt free currency. He wants to eliminate corrupt federal agencies, which add miles of red tape and reduce our competitiveness.

Both right and left leaning outlets are beholden to their party’s establishment candidates regardless of how much of a let down they may be. Obama has let down the left in every conceivable way by essentially continuing the policy of George W. Bush on all foreign policy decisions and enraged the right by continuing the destructive bailouts and corporate welfare, which Bush began. Obama has done nothing but dole out handouts to all special interest groups. Outlets like MSNBC, almost completely irrelevant in terms of ratings, have been working overtime to apologize and explain away Obama’s policies in ways that appear logical on their face to left leaning and progressive Americans. The response I often hear from democrats is that they believe Obama has done the best he could have done, granted the awful hand he was dealt. Given our skyrocketing debt, slipping education, declining health, increasing poverty and standing on the precipice of a 3rd World War I cannot accept that conclusion.

Obama is running unopposed by the Democratic Party and yet the establishment media does not question this. In addition, they show their true colors by not desiring a candidate from the right who will actually push Obama to be intellectually honest in the debates and his campaign promises. If the media were actually interested in the best interests of our country’s future then they would want an intellectually honest debate to find out who the best leader for our country is. Instead, the left backs up Obama 100% and the right wants anyone BUT Ron Paul.

Ron Paul represents a separation from the team sport mentality of right versus left that the establishment media represents and promotes. Ron Paul is as much a politician as he is an educator. If the American public broke from their flicker rate programed trance and stopped accepting the talking points of unqualified pundits then their gravy train of false status and privilege could be in real danger for the first time since the inception of televised news.

Posted in Democracy, Elections, Media, Propaganda, Ron Paul, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

In Context, Monday at Noon

Join us, Monday, January 23, 2012 at noon.  After a review of the latest news here and abroad, we’ll speak with journalist Ebong Udoma about the government’s response to the disastrous power outage in the northeast United States following last October’s freak snow storm.  Check out the report of Connecticut Governor Dan Malloy’s storm panel. Call in during the program or, if you prefer, drop us an email before or during the program at ken@mdrtalk.org. The show will be broadcast on WPKN 89.5 FM and stream at www.wpkn.org.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Looming War With Iran

For the first time since the end of the Second World War we are looking at the very real possibility of a global war.  This war could engulf not only the Middle East but also spread to Asia, Europe and even to the continental United States.

The United States seems to be beyond all reason in its desire to attack Iran.  The American pundits and indeed many of the European pundits believe that we could destroy the Iranian Navy and Air Force in a matter of days, much the same way that we destroyed the Iraqi military in 2003. However, to compare the Iranian Armed Force at present to the Iraqi Armed Forces in 2003 is absurd.

Firstly, in 2003 Iraq had been under sanctions for 11 years.  Iraq was isolated with few friends in the international community. Secondly, Iraq had not received very much in terms of military aid from abroad. Saddam’s forces were largely equipped with old Soviet era weaponry. Thirdly, the morale of the Iraqi Army was incredibly poor. Most Iraqi soldiers were demoralized from their defeat in the 1980 – 1988 Iran – Iraq War and that morale only sank lower with years of crippling sanctions.

In stark contrast, Iran has been receiving not only economic but military aid from both Russia and China. Russia and China have additionally pledged their undying support to Iran. Russia has signed a Mutual Defense Treaty with Iran and Major General Zhang Zhaozhong of the Chinese National Defense University declared China was willing to launch World War III in order to defend Iran.

Additionally, with the help of trade with Russia and China, Iranians have maintained a high standard of living and as a result, support for the government is very strong. Foreign sanctions, which might diminish that standard of living, are only rallying people to support the government of the only Islamic Republic in the world.

Furthermore, the Iranian military is technologically very advanced. They managed to bring down a top secret CIA Stealth Drone by, some suspect, intercepting the GPS signal from the satellite to the drone and telling the drone to land safely inside Iran. While I am sure it was Russian or Chinese technology that made this possible, the fact is that if Iran has the capabilities of intercepting our GPS signals, they could completely disorient and confuse our entire military. The entire US Military relies on GPS for everything from land navigation to guided bombs such as Cruise Missiles and JDAMS.

Most importantly of all, Russia has openly admitted that they have sold S-300 Surface to Air Missile Systems to Iran. It is believed that these missiles are capable of bringing down the latest in US Military hardware. Russia has also reportedly sold Iran the Avtobaza ground-based electronic intelligence and jamming system, which is suspected to have brought down the RQ-170 Surveillance Drone. Moreover, the Iranian Kosar/Shahab 5 Intercontinental Ballistic Missile appears to have been developed with the help of the Chinese Aeronautics Industry.

The American people must realize that a war with Iran will not be a quick and simple one. We are not taking on a demoralized and battered force, like in Iraq, or a bunch of rag tag farmers, like in Afghanistan. We are picking a fight with a country that is not only equipped with the latest in Chinese and Russian Military hardware, but also has military alliances with the Chinese and the Russians. Make no mistake, if we attack Iran we may very well find ourselves engulfed in another World War and one that may bring the fighting to the streets of America. China alone can field one soldier for every American citizen and roughly 10 million Chinese males reach military age every year. Add the Russian Armed Forces to the mix and we are looking at a war unlike any we have ever seen.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Yesterday’s podcast, 1-9-12

Hi everyone, here’s the podcast for the first show of 2012. We covered the recent news in the wars and republican primaries in Iowa and New Hampshire. Then we spoke with trainer and nutritionist Csaba Pesci about how to start off the new year the right diet and lifestyle routines to make yourself a better version of you.

Posted in Democracy, Elections, Food, Health, Show news, War | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

In Context, Monday at Noon

Start the year with self-improvement. At noon on Monday, January 9, 2012 on In Context, speak with our guest, exercise and nutrition expert Csaba Pesci who has trained, both, Olympians and ordinary folks. Before our discussion with Csaba, we’ll review the latest headlines including the Republican presidential primaries and the U.S.-Iran war threat.  Call in during the show, or send us an email before or during the show to ken@mdrtalk.org.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Podcast for December War Report, 12-26-11

Hi everyone, in case you missed the live broadcast here is the podcast for today’s show. We discussed recent unrest in Bahrain and Syria. We talked about the surge in violence in Iraq and further uncertainty surrounding Iran.

Posted in CIA, Elections, Geopolitics, Show news | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment